sanguinoso

- friends
146 link karma
1,238 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE

Either you do this every single time, or you're a dirty liar. by cdsparksin funny

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

My update setting is just to notify me that updates are available

Is that a setting you changed from the default? I don't use any of the non-enterprise versions of Windows so I honestly don't know.

Either you do this every single time, or you're a dirty liar. by cdsparksin funny

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

By installing your own OS you're already more advanced than most users. I haven't purchased a computer with Windows on it in quite some time so this is a serious question: does the OEM install ask you for your update choice? Also, this may just be semantics as we can probably agree that the average user would probably just check whatever is "recommended" by Microsoft which is most likely fully automatic.

Oh hockey players... by AnonymousRhynocorisin AdviceAnimals

[–]sanguinoso 3 points4 points ago

To be fair to this chap, I believe its a common prank for hockey players to loosen the caps to get their teammates wet.

Source: someone posted a video on here of pranks hockey players play.

Either you do this every single time, or you're a dirty liar. by cdsparksin funny

[–]sanguinoso 15 points16 points ago

The point is that by default Linux doesn't force you to restart in some arbitrary amount of time. You may restart when you choose to.

Subban should get 10 games. 5 for an illegal hit to the head, and 5 more for a disgraceful turtle. by jpadams87in BostonBruins

[–]sanguinoso 1 point2 points ago

If he doesn't get suspended from this it will be a disgrace. He takes a cheap shot on Krecji and somehow the Canadiens end up with a PP? Isn't that an invitation for other teams to pull this shit on Boston? They know someone on the Bruins will fight after a cheap shot and then they can just turtle and get the PP.

Subban should get 10 games. 5 for an illegal hit to the head, and 5 more for a disgraceful turtle. by jpadams87in BostonBruins

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

I agree with you. He seems like the type of player who would be locker room poison. I don't think anyone in the NHL likes PK Subban. Not even his teammates

Anyone watching the abysmal reffing in this Bruins Jets game? by [deleted]in hockey

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

It was bad. All the way around. A penalty shot for lifting the stick? Goalie interference for being pushed into the goalie and then jumped on? Terrible.

Here's another look at that Marchand "hip" check by neosapienin hockey

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

Except that according to the rules it wasn't clipping. Marchand didn't hit at the knee or below. Therefore its not clipping.

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

44.1 Clipping - Clipping is the act of throwing the body, from any direction, across or below the knees of an opponent. A player may not deliver a check in a “clipping” manner, nor lower his own body position to deliver a check on or below an opponent’s knees. An illegal “low hit” is a check that is delivered by a player or goalkeeper who may or may not have both skates on the ice, with his sole intent to check the opponent in the area of his knees. A player may not lower his body position to deliver a check to an opponent’s knees.

The penalty for clipping says nothing about "putting on the brakes" or "leaning away". Ballard struck the other player at the knees which is clipping. Marchand did not strike the knees or below so it is therefore not clipping. I'm not saying Marchand's hit was definitely legal but what rule did he break? (If any).

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

The rules are more like guidelines.

This is the first thing you've said that actually answers the question. If referees are not required to strictly adhere to the rule book then Marchand's hit could be ruled clipping because it is almost clipping.

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

44.1 Clipping - Clipping is the act of throwing the body, from any direction, across or below the knees of an opponent. A player may not deliver a check in a “clipping” manner, nor lower his own body position to deliver a check on or below an opponent’s knees. An illegal “low hit” is a check that is delivered by a player or goalkeeper who may or may not have both skates on the ice, with his sole intent to check the opponent in the area of his knees. A player may not lower his body position to deliver a check to an opponent’s knees.

You're right! One is clipping, and that is Ballard's hit. He clearly strikes the other player across the knees making it clipping. Marchand however, does not strike the knee of Salo and therefore it is not clipping. I'm not saying Marchand's was definitely legal, I just want to see the actual rule he broke. I think both hits should be illegal (fyi).

Every time I log onto my parents' computer by instasquidin AdviceAnimals

[–]sanguinoso 2 points3 points ago

The blind maybe?

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso -1 points0 points ago

First of all that's an ad hominem. Second of all neither player in the Ballard play plays the puck so how is the context "very, very different." Just because Salo got hurt? All I see is Ballard ducking a hit and striking someone at knee level. If he got hurt would that warrant a suspension as well? I personally don't like any hits below the waist (I am rather large and got plenty of hip checks, ducks and leg checks in my day) and I think the rule should be modify to eliminate both plays altogether. I just think its hypocritical that you can't see that both hits are extremely similar, with the one difference being I can't actually find a rule that Marchand broke.

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso 1 point2 points ago

Ah, but like I said before, what rule? Just because Salo got hurt doesn't automatically make it against the rules. The contact was not at knee level therefore its not clipping. I am not saying that it wasn't for sure against the rules but I am looking for a specific rule not "it was dirty" or he "broke the rules".

Is this a charge? (Sharks vs Capitals; Jan 7, 2012) by Harris_Ferrisin hockey

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

I might be alone on this one but it does look like he leaves his feet which would make it a valid charging call.

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso -3 points-2 points ago

Should give a suspension for this hit too then. An injury could have happened just as easily. And this one was actually clipping!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=m5NjcR3NsWU

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso -4 points-3 points ago

Whats the difference between Marchand's and this hit? Just the injury?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=m5NjcR3NsWU

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso 1 point2 points ago

But you said: "his hip/abdomen hit Salo in the middle thigh". This does not make it clipping. Clipping is across or below the knees. Its where he makes contact not where "his butt was". Sure suspend him it makes no difference to me, my point is the league needs to have explicit rules in place for this type of situation. I quoted the rule book, you just said "it was clipping". Yes it was dangerous and he did a flip but there are plenty of hip checks where players flip over that are also very dangerous but those seem to be allowed.

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso 4 points5 points ago

But without breaking a rule I don't think the league should do anything. If the league decides that this is "a dirty hit" then they should write a rule explicitly banning it. I would be fine with banning all hits below the waist (this includes most hip checks I see in the NHL). I think it erodes discipline when the league is allowed to just decide if something is "dirty". If a rule is broken they should punish it. Everyone is complaining about this hit but I cannot find a rule that was broken. And I am certainly looking for one.

Marchand to face hearing Monday by hahkein hockey

[–]sanguinoso -2 points-1 points ago* 

This is a serious question that I hope someone will answer. I had never heard of clipping before so I looked it up.

44.1 Clipping - Clipping is the act of throwing the body, from any direction, across or below the knees of an opponent. A player may not deliver a check in a “clipping” manner, nor lower his own body position to deliver a check on or below an opponent’s knees. An illegal “low hit” is a check that is delivered by a player or goalkeeper who may or may not have both skates on the ice, with his sole intent to check the opponent in the area of his knees. A player may not lower his body position to deliver a check to an opponent’s knees.

Now, in the video its pretty clear that its not across or below the opponents knees. Also, Marchand reaches the puck first so Salo is in the act of hitting him, not the other way around. Now I can agree that this hit should be illegal, but until someone shows me a quote from the nhl rule book I'm reserving judgment. What rule covers this incident? It clearly isn't "clipping".

EDIT: Like why does this hit not draw a similar penalty? Just because there was no injury? http://youtu.be/m5NjcR3NsWU

The Brawl (notice Henrick Sedin hop on the bench when it breaks out ) by zz23kein BostonBruins

[–]sanguinoso 0 points1 point ago

Yep but he engaged. How Lucic got thrown out but none of the Canucks did is beyond me.

The officer who pepper-sprayed UC Davis students is Lt. John Pike. Give his PD a call. 530-752-1727 by Mind_Virusin Bad_Cop_No_Donut

[–]sanguinoso 7 points8 points ago

That's insane. I mean its pretty clear they're not resisting, I read on here somewhere that the SJC ruled that pepper spraying non-violent protesters was unconstitutional. How can they get away with this?

The officer who pepper-sprayed UC Davis students is Lt. John Pike. Give his PD a call. 530-752-1727 by Mind_Virusin Bad_Cop_No_Donut

[–]sanguinoso 4 points5 points ago

Is this photo shopped? Its an honest question. Does the pepper spray show up that vividly in a photo?

view more: next