rspeer

- friends
698 link karma
3,585 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE

Russia, Japan aim for the Moon: "We're talking about establishing permanent bases." by mepperin science

[–]rspeer 6 points7 points ago

This bot doesn't work.

What "amazing fact" or colloquialism do you know is actually wrong, and you're sick of correcting people about it? by TestZeroin AskReddit

[–]rspeer 30 points31 points ago

The purpose of a large vocabulary is to make communication as clear as possible, not to show off that you are smarter than your listener.

When you unnecessarily use a word that even educated people are likely to understand incorrectly, you are communicating badly.

reddit, I've answered a lot your questions about being deaf, and I'd like you to return the favor. I have some questions about hearing. (Also, you can AMA about deafness) by Deafyin AskReddit

[–]rspeer 0 points1 point ago

I was raised by black parents but I can't understand any dialogue written in black dialect. I know not all black people talk like that but is there a way to mark that in a novel?

Man, I can see why this would be really hard to sort out when you've never heard the phonetics of words.

When someone hears someone speaking a dialect that's different from theirs, the thing that they tend to notice most is the pronunciation. There are other differences that you can notice without hearing the words, such as different word choices and different grammar. But the pronunciation can be different on nearly every word, so that's what hearing people notice the most.

In writing, you can spell words differently to convey that someone is speaking in a noticeably different dialect. It has the implication that the speaker is hard to understand, possibly "out of place", and possibly uneducated.

Note, for example, that if black characters in a novel are speaking to each other in AAVE in a situation where it's totally normal for them to be speaking AAVE, their dialogue will be written in standard spelling.

AAVE and Ebonics mean the same thing with different connotations. AAVE is a very academic, descriptive name for the dialect that many black Americans speak (especially within their own culture). Ebonics was originally intended to be a descriptive name, too, but now it's used as a derogatory term. "Jive" refers to a version of the dialect spoken in some places in the '70s; you would probably not refer to anyone as "speaking jive" anymore.

Here's what's going on with the spelling. If you say "for sure" in AAVE it sounds like the syllables "fo sho", so you could indicate that someone sounds distinctly black by writing "fo sho" instead of "for sure". AAVE tends to drop g's and some l's and r's at the ends of things.

I know you wouldn't expect "for sure" and "fo sho" to sound that similar from the spelling. That's English being messed up with dialects messing things up even more.

The interactions between dialects can be really confusing, and this is often used as a humorous device. That's what's going on in Airplane in the "Excuse me, I speak Jive" scene. The two passengers are speaking so strongly in dialect that most people watching the movie can't even understand what they're saying. Except it's got subtitles. The subtitles are in really formal standard American English and they sound nothing like what they're saying.

Another comedic reference that comes to mind is in Chapelle's "racial draft" skit. When Tiger Woods gets drafted as an official black person he excitedly shouts "for shizzle!". He's trying to say "fo' shizzle", a very black variant of "for sure" popularized by Snoop Dogg, but he says it like a white person who has only ever seen "shizzle" written down and never heard anyone actually say it.

Disclaimer: I'm a computational linguist but not a real linguist, and I am also totally white, so I probably said something wrong.

[Discussion] Ch. 13: BlooP and FlooP and GlooP by rspeerin GEB

[–]rspeer[S] 5 points6 points ago

When browsing around, I found a fascinating page about a theoretical language that is more powerful than all Turing-complete languages -- with the drawback of being totally impossible to implement. A discussion of GEB on c2 (the oldest wiki) proposed it as a candidate for GlooP:

Pimc Pifl Pire

[Discussion] Ch. 13: BlooP and FlooP and GlooP by rspeerin GEB

[–]rspeer[S] 2 points3 points ago

Let's start with the BlooP exercises, as there are a lot of them.

Without necessarily writing the program, can you determine whether it is possible to write the following programs using BlooP?

It may help to keep in mind that the intent of BlooP is to be able to do anything any other programming language can do, as long as you can put a bound on how many steps every program will take to run.

  1. GOLDBACH?[N]: tests whether a number has the Goldbach property (being the sum of two primes)
  2. FACTORIAL[N]: calcluates N factorial
  3. REMAINDER[M,N]: calculates the remainder of dividing M by N (often called "M mod N" in programming)?
  4. PI-DIGIT[N]: calculates the Nth digit of pi
  5. FIBO[N]: calculates the Nth Fibonacci number
  6. PRIME-BEYOND[N]: calculates the lowest prime number beyond N
  7. PERFECT[N]: calculates the Nth perfect number
  8. PRIME?[N]: determines whether N is prime
  9. PERFECT?[N]: determines whether N is perfect
  10. TRIVIAL?[A,B,C,N]: determines if AN + BN = CN
  11. PIERRE?[A,B,C]: determines if AN + BN = CN for some N>1
  12. FERMAT?[N]: determines if AN + BN = CN for some A, B, and C
  13. TORTOISE-PAIR?[M,N]: determines if both M and M+N are prime
  14. TORTOISE?[N]: determines if N is the difference of two primes
  15. MIU-WELL-FORMED?[N]: determines if N is a well-formed MIU number, such as 310
  16. MIU-PROOF-PAIR?[M,N]: determines if M is a derivation of N in the MIU system
  17. MIU-THEOREM?[N]: determines if N is a MIU theorem
  18. TNT-THEOREM?[N]: determines if N is a TNT theorem
  19. FALSE?[N]: determines if N is a false statement of TNT

Also, which of these answers have changed since the publication of GEB?

[Weekly Discussion Thread] Scientists, what is the biggest open question in your field? by fastparticlesin askscience

[–]rspeer 1 point2 points ago

If you're not there already, you should join us for the readthrough in /r/GEB!

Watch out, when it comes time to talk about consciousness I'm also going to point people to Marvin Minsky, who uses the same kind of thinking to come to a totally different conclusion.

Oh Snap! Judge in Oracle v Google is a programmer and knows just how trivial the 9 lines of code google 'copied' are. by FoetusBurgerin Android

[–]rspeer 1 point2 points ago

Funny you should mention that -- isn't the implementation of Timsort the place where the "infringing" nine lines of rangeCheck appear?

[BWV 988] The Goldberg Variations (Glenn Gould) by rspeerin GEB

[–]rspeer[S] 0 points1 point ago

For better sound quality, here it is as a Spotify playlist. (Requires a subscription or being interrupted by ads for Facebook apps every few tracks.)

[BWV 988] The Goldberg Variations (Glenn Gould) by rspeerin GEB

[–]rspeer[S] 0 points1 point ago

This is the big one! The Goldberg Variations are probably the work Bach was most famous for in his own lifetime. And this video is probably the performance Glenn Gould is most famous for.

The video is 47 minutes long. If you're impatient, try skipping to around 6:24, which I'd say is one of the better-known variations, and some of the really exciting variations come directly after it.

But if you've got the time, it's worth listening to the whole thing! Maybe put it on while you're reading about BlooP and FlooP and GlooP.

The Variations begin and end with the "aria", a slow, song-like performance of the main theme; in between them are 30 variations that take the general musical idea in the aria and do 30 very different things with it. Though they all come from a common idea, this is not to say that they have anything resembling the same notes.

Saw this in my high school choir room today........release the penguins. by Jiggyfly325in WTF

[–]rspeer 1 point2 points ago

I came here to say "First person to confuse this with U. N. Owen Was Her gets stabbed with a treble clef", but I am too late.

[Discussion] Dialogue 13: "Aria with Diverse Variations" by rspeerin GEB

[–]rspeer[S] 0 points1 point ago

Yep.

[Discussion] Dialogue 13: "Aria with Diverse Variations" by rspeerin GEB

[–]rspeer[S] 0 points1 point ago

To get started:

  • What's the hidden message in the Complete List of All Great Mathematicians, and what does it have to do with Bach? (Feel free to link to the relevant XKCD comic.)
  • Why is the Gold Box so very Asian?
  • Where is the "real" end of this dialogue?

Our *real* first gay president -- Don't believe what Newsweek's cover tells you: The first gay president was James Buchanan more than a century ago by pineappleskunkin politics

[–]rspeer 0 points1 point ago

Totally correct on Clinton playing the sax, but wait until you fact-check Nations of the World.

It took the entire length of the class to spot it... by perneroin funny

[–]rspeer 1 point2 points ago

It doesn't matter what color it ended up being. That is the day you truly learned science.

[Discussion] Ch. 12: "Minds and Thoughts" by rspeerin GEB

[–]rspeer[S] 1 point2 points ago

So we're starting to get into claims about intelligence and consciousness.

Hofstadter says that having a symbol for oneself is a necessary part of consciousness. But it's clearly not the only thing. (Necessary but not sufficient, as one might say in math.)

One example that comes quickly to mind: there are a whole lot of computers around that have self symbols. Windows computers have a window called "My Computer". Macs have a dialog called "About This Mac". Both of these involve code that allow a computer to refer to itself and (some of) its components, but presumably they do not make the computer conscious. What's something computers are missing that prevents them from being conscious?

(If your philosophical stance is panpsychism, this question doesn't apply, but then I have some other questions for you.)

The Coming Meltdown in College Education & Why The Economy Won’t Get Better Any Time Soon by arcadeninjasanin Economics

[–]rspeer 7 points8 points ago

I kept being distracted from the point of the article by how atrocious his writing is. I have seen better, clearer writing on the average passive-aggressive note in an apartment building's laundry room.

This guy has a book? People buy it?

[BWV 816] French Suite No. 5: Allemande by rspeerin GEB

[–]rspeer[S] 0 points1 point ago

A very, very loose connection to the previous dialogue. But this is the movement of one of Bach's French Suites whose title actually means "German".

When someone dies, does anyone actually go and change every "is" to "was" in their wikipedia article? by kobe_bryant_reactionin wikipedia

[–]rspeer 86 points87 points ago

Jobs was listed as either primary inventor or co-inventor in 342 United States patents or patent applications.

"Interpersonal computing was going to revolutionize human communications and groupwork", Jobs told reporters.

A major feature of the iPhone 4S, introduced in October 2011, was Siri, which was a virtual assistant that was capable of voice recognition.

Following the keynote, an Apple spokesperson said that "Steve's health was robust."

-- Death Bot

When someone dies, does anyone actually go and change every "is" to "was" in their wikipedia article? by kobe_bryant_reactionin wikipedia

[–]rspeer 7 points8 points ago

Someone adds it once, then a bot tries to keep it consistent between all the languages. So, often, it's because someone who translated the article to a new language put in the link to the English version, and then the bot added the links to that language on English and all the other existing versions.

But the bots get confused in some cases, like when something is a disambiguation page in one language and it's not even ambiguous in another.

This is killing me by influenzain pics

[–]rspeer 9 points10 points ago

It isn't if you've ever seen the game Q*bert.

view more: next