Just basing my opinion on facts unlike you.

There is a legitimate reason blacks and hispanics are disproportionally incarcerated. It is because they commit more crimes. For blacks, even though they make up less than 15% of the total population blacks comprise almost 50% of the country's murder, rape, and theft.

• For men in their early thirties, African-Americans are about 7 times more likely to have a prison record than whites.

• According to a 2009 report by the Pew Hispanic Center, in 2007, Latinos "accounted for 40% of all sentenced federal offenders-more than triple their share (13%) of the total U.S. adult population". This was an increase from 24% in 1991. 72% of the Latino offenders were not U.S. citizens.

• The "National Youth Gang Survey Analysis" (2009) state that of gang members, 49% are Hispanic/Latino, 35% are African-American/black, 9% are white, and 7% are other race/ethnicity.

• Most studies find that the more ethnically/racially heterogeneous(mixed) an area is, the higher its crime rates tend to be. (Handbook of Crime Correlates; Lee Ellis, Kevin M. Beaver, John Wright; 2009; Academic Press)

• Homicide offenders by race

• In his book The g Factor (1998), Arthur Jensen cites data which shows that, regardless of race, people with IQs between 70 and 90 have higher crime rates than people with IQs below or above this range. Jensen and others have claimed that the average IQ of African Americans is 85, to be compared with 100 for White Americans and 106 for Asian Americans.

• Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are committing more than 50 times the number of violent racial crimes of whites.

• According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black assailants and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times the rate that whites murder blacks.1

• The NCVS(2008) clearly shows that black criminals target whites. Single-offender crimes: blacks committed 83% of the 520,000 violent inter-racial crimes involving blacks and whites nationwide.

• Black criminals chose white victims 54% of the time, but white criminals chose black victims only 4.6% of the time.

• Blacks were 32 times more likely to attack whites than whites were to attack blacks. For robbery, they were 67 times more likely.

• There were over 19,000 black on white rapes/ sexual assaults nationwide, but too few white on black rapes to calculate a nationwide figure. (the survey found no more than 10).

• Multiple-offender crimes: blacks committed 142,000 violent group crimes against whites nationwide, including 89,000 assaults and 49,000 robberies. There were too few violent white-on-black group crimes of any kind to extrapolate to the entire country.

• Groups of black criminals chose white victims 55% of the time. As with single offender crimes, blacks prefer to attack whites.

• “But that’s just because Whites are Richer” No, it’s not. Only 21% of all black on white crimes were robberies. The rest were assaults, sexual assaults, and rapes, with no economic motive.

• According to United States Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, in the United States in 2005, 37,460 White females were sexually assaulted or raped by a Black man, while between zero and ten Black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a White man. There were overall 111,590 white victims of rape/sexual assault in 2005

• "Oh, it's all because they are a minority. If they only had more hand-outs etc. etc." Oh really? What about the Asian minority? By your 'logic', since Asians are an even smaller minority they should be an even more violent, criminal group per-person than African Americans or Hispanics and even more in 'need' of hand-outs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence

1. The bell curve for whites is centered roughly around IQ 100; the bell curve for American blacks roughly around 85

2. IQ is strongly related, probably more so than any other single measureable human trait, to many important educational, occupational, economic, and social outcomes.

There is a reality which no one wants to admit that there is a difference in biology between ethnicities which is more than skin deep. While of course generalised, these differences are important to be conscious of when looking at sociological studies. By ignoring ethnicity we are being unscientific.

Its very simple. Different ethnicities evolved in different environments and are genetically different enough to have different innate skills and behaviours. There is similar genetic variance between a wolf and a labrador than between a West African and a South East Asian. This is scientific fact. Now if you truly do not believe that wolves are innately different to labradors you are a fucking idiot.

People cry that the IQ tests are biased, or that there are many other factors such as culture and surroundings yet nobody has ever been able to come up with an IQ test that shows anything different than the current results.

I personally judge every individual on their own merits how I find them, but if you want to have a discussion about these things you need to do so scientifically and not emotionally.

Anyone saying the science is not clear has other motives.