piratelax40

- friends
60 link karma
2,527 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Three-Year Club

    Verified Email

    Secret Santa
    2009

I should be able to get a house when I'm, say, 30? by hereforthekittehsin fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu

[–]piratelax40 6 points7 points ago

PhD's are for people that don't mind being poor temporarily - but no debt -for potential great gains. People that get PhD's in super essoteric fields that don't have job prospects are because they don't do anything to make themselves marketable. Sure you love astrophysics, but you're not going to find shit for jobs outside of university, but if you bone up with a couple other core classes while you're at it you can market yourself as someone who is a fucking astrophysist - doing that financial analysis/mathematical analysis for a business etc is easy as pie.

No, most people just don't want to do that - they want to do stay in the field they're super passionate about money-be-damned. That of course is their choice.

Brian Baker: The Wonder That Tennis Forgot - WSJ.com by archibotin tennis

[–]piratelax40 4 points5 points ago

He's so chill too. My girlfriend played for Vanderbilt and when I'd visit her we'd go out with him and other tennis people - obviously very humble and down-to-earth. Not a wiff of could-have-been-amazing-tennis-star arrogance.

Fast transition to VFFs/barefoot? by jarjardinksin BarefootRunning

[–]piratelax40 0 points1 point ago

How was the tough mudder in them? I am debating running in them but have heard that the grip is so poor going up some of the muddy slopes you're better off with proper trail shoes.

ELI5: the problem with Monsanto and its rise to becoming such a prominent monopoly. by fuckwinterdreamsin explainlikeimfive

[–]piratelax40 6 points7 points ago

the biggest thing that people forget is that using monsanto's seed/fertilizer combo is significantly cheaper - so when they 'pull you in' they do so by saying, sure you can go back to your more traditional ways, but you will also go back to spending more per acre on the overall cost. People forget that there are many more costs than just the seeds.

Products like round-up ready seeds decrease the cost per acre due to the fact that you don't have to till the soil or other very labor intensive things that are usually necessary or else weeds would overwhelm the budding seeds.

I believe the average cost savings per acre is something like $20 so when you have a thousand acre farm and you have both a decreased cost as well as signifantly decreased work it makes it difficult to justify going back to non-GM seed - and even if you do everyone else that is still using it can keep their prices lower than yours.

Have you ever thought about BJJ as an investment? by Ballisticsin bjj

[–]piratelax40 3 points4 points ago

Edit: I found the psychological effect I talked about the dunning-kruger effect and here is an interesting write-up on how that comes into account for multiplayer games but you can easily see how this is applicable to any competitive activity in general.

Most people, in any sport/activity, will not get anywhere near a black belt level no matter how long they train for. Regardless of whether the sport is exploding or not, I would guess the average person could get to purple belt - eventually. Past that requires huge numbers of hours in training/drilling/technique work that frankly most people are not passionate enough or don't have the means to go past. Take tennis for example, the basic breakdown of divisions is 2.5, 3.0 (what I consider encompasses white belt to BJJ) 3.5, 4.0 (blue belt), 4.5 (purple) 5.0-5.5 (brown) and professional (black). Most guys will play for 30+ years but never get past low 4.5 - they aren't interested in taking lessons and drilling their forehand technique over and over and over for slightly better results progressively. You'll also see guys that will come in, get really into it, taking weekly lessons etc that in a couple years will surpass almost anyone around them that isn't a college-bound junior player or a previous college player. The same is true for just about any activity that requires some balance of athletism, technique, and mental dexterity. For better or worse, BJJ and tennis both have a huge mental/technique aspect. It's awesome as you don't have to be the biggest/strongest to still succeed, but it also can frustrate a lot of 'athletes' that can go into other sports and do well by getting enough technique to survive and then bullrushing their way through those smaller guys.

I can't remember what the actual name of the hypothesis is - but this famous psychologist put forth a proposal called the something-or-other effect, that basically said lower-level people are actually so bad at that activity in comparison to higher level people that they literally cannot process the difficulty in progressing upwards. They see their huge linear gains in the beginning and expect that to carry through, when in reality, many of the nuances that separate the top echelon people are things that take hundreds of hours of practice to obtain a 1% 'increase' in that aspect. This in turn makes a lot of people believe, well if I started earlier, or had more time I could get to that level, look how well I'm doing now and how much better I'm getting. In reality, most people experience those initial gains, but its the people that are willing to absolutely stick through it for countless hours for marginal additional gain are the ones that slowly separate themselves.

Tl:dr - I highly doubt you're suddenly going to see this huge influx of black belts

Cast your vote for favorite looking spaceship! by clonetekin StarWars

[–]piratelax40 1 point2 points ago

not any longer!

Challenging IF/ADF/any sort of prolonged fast by Scuzzbucket_Salin Fitness

[–]piratelax40 -1 points0 points ago

Kiefer graduated Magna Cum Laude with a Bachelor’s in Mathematics and a Bachelor’s in Physics in three years then became a Ph.D. candidate in physics at the University of Florida in only a year

I call full bullshit - there are not only minimum course requirements - but there are time contraints from when you take your prelim to when you are allowed to present your dissertation.

Unless this dude was able to magically pack in 40 credit hours a semester, finish his prelim in the first couple months, do all the necessary research, and then present to his committee he's full of shit

Edit: yep from the Florida physics FAQ The Graduate Catalog states that the minimum number of credits necessary to obtain a Ph.D. is 90 credits after a Bachelors of Science Degree (B.S.). As physics students usually gain credits at the rate of 24 credits a year, this means that a Ph.D. can be obtained in less than four years.

Add in the prelim, the oral and written qualifying exam, research, and PhD writing and defense.

Chemical ignorance. by PraecorLoth970in chemistry

[–]piratelax40 7 points8 points ago

try telling people you're working on a PhD in toxicology developing the TEEERRRIBLE GMO's :-/

Ever wonder what happens what an ultracentrifuge rotor fails at 30K RPM? by attamattiin biology

[–]piratelax40 4 points5 points ago

centrifuges are awesome for separating a solution into different components. At 'low' RPM's they can easily separate based on density, so for something like blood, where you want to separate the red blood cells and the plasma, the more dense stuff goes to the bottom (red blood cells) while the plasma remains on top.

The spinning works to create a force in one direction (like gravity). When you start spinning it faster it would be the same as giving a stronger force in that one direction. That is why things separate by density, the more dense stuff is 'pushed' through the lighter stuff the same way a more dense rock sinks to the bottom of water.

When you start to get to higher RPMs the amount of force is actually enough to cause things to start to break apart. The cool thing is, the more compact/strong something is, the more RPM's you need to break it apart. This allows you to separate individual components of something (like a cell) by speeding the centrifuge up to a point where everything bigger than the object your looking for will break apart and shred so it floats in solution, while the stuff you want forms a very small dense pellet at the bottom.

For example, if you are trying to extract DNA from a cell, you can spin a solution of cells really really fast so that the cell membrane shreds, and the nucleus shreds, but the DNA stays intact. The DNA and some small organelles will 'survive' and form a small pellet at the bottom so you can suck off the top solution with all the other cellular parts floating in it and you are only left with the DNA. Then you can add a different liquid that would do something to the DNA to make it such that you can resuspend it and filter it away from whatever is left.

Thats a very very basic concept of how they are used but that is the general idea.

So I tried out the Ezekiel choke last night... by voodoochild87in bjj

[–]piratelax40 0 points1 point ago

Most people do walk around in 'gi's'. Anyone wearing a jacket you could choke all the same.

4 months net progress pics (and a testament to Leangains) by gmiwenhtin Fitness

[–]piratelax40 10 points11 points ago

I can answer this for many of the fitness hivemind (though I personally don't agree with it and do shit tons of cardio as well as my goals are athletic). For many who's goals are aesthetic only, the cardio provides minimal purpose (fat loss) vs just watching your calories properly. For those who's goal is maximal strength, cardio inhibits maximal muscle growth and can impede progress.

My personal opinion is train as an athlete, train speed, agility, strength, endurance, balance etc so you can go tackle anything in life.

Can getting a PhD be worth the 6-ish years of delayed/lost income? by aspiringadultin personalfinance

[–]piratelax40 0 points1 point ago

no problem - I have gone through a lot of the same soul searching - as much as I wanted alphabet soup (adding a second masters and another minor to my already co-major PhD in progress) my advisor finally proverbally bitch-slapped me and said, who cares about those extras, they'll get you a little better chance at landing your first job, after that it's all about the experience you have, how you're perceived and who you know. Focus on the experience, think of your degree(s) as the tools to shape who you are and how you approach said experiences. As awesome as it is to have a shiny second hammer, if you are cutting down trees the real thing you need is someone showing you how to saw. That might only take a couple weeks in the real world, and they'll give you the opportunity to learn how to saw because they see that you know your way around a hammer and are smart enough to train you in what you need to know.

Can getting a PhD be worth the 6-ish years of delayed/lost income? by aspiringadultin personalfinance

[–]piratelax40 18 points19 points ago

The real question is what job do you want - and what are the necessary requirements. For example, if you want to be a psychologist you have to have a PhD, no way around it.

As for getting another bachelors degree - that seems ridiculous - if you need to get another degree, take any necessary supplementary classes while working then get a masters degree. I bet you could get a tuition discount as you are working for a college. Otherwise, just dive into a field (business etc) that it isn't so much about the degree but rather what you can do, you'll probably start at an entry level job that even if your degree is in underwater basketweaving, as long as it comes from an accredited college you qualify - but then you start working your way up. A single good gig in a job for a field you want to work in would probably be worth more than a second bachelors degree.

Fell on my wrists by MrPadofPaperin Fitness

[–]piratelax40 0 points1 point ago

haha no problem - I have a chronic wrist issue from a crossfit injury a couple years ago that I didn't realize the importance of good rehab. Its put a huge damper on how well I can try new activities without pain. I don't want anyone to run into that situation!

Fell on my wrists by MrPadofPaperin Fitness

[–]piratelax40 1 point2 points ago

alright here are the motions you should be doing:

  • wrist flexion
  • wrist extension
  • ulner deviation
  • radial deviation
  • pronation *supination

A quick google will show you a number of easy exercises to do for each. Sorry I got to run or else I'd link you to them.

Fell on my wrists by MrPadofPaperin Fitness

[–]piratelax40 2 points3 points ago

I'm going to add a couple things - first of all - most new research is showing that you should only be taking ibueprofen if there is swelling, it blocks too much of the 'good' healing attributes of inflammation as long as the bad and will slow rehab. If you are uncomfortable (but not swollen) take tylenol, it is an analgesic (pain killer) only. At any point in time you are a-ok taking both tylenol and ibeuprofen at the same time (one for inflammation, and excreted via kidney, one for pain and metabolized in liver) so you won't 'overdose' on either and there is essentially no drug drug interactions.

Second, I would start rehab within 3 days, you need to keep the tissue mobilized to keep scar tissue to a minimum, and the tissue that does arise needs to be continually broken up and aligned with your regular tissue.

Also, there are a number of 'better' wrist exercises I'll give you (read just more than curls and rotation) you need to keep in mind with all of them, you want only 'good' pain, dull and low, anything sharp or very painful is too much. Lastly don't forget to stretch your wrists well after each 'workout' to work on mobility.

May get a job halfway around the country for $15k more a year, but we have no cash, $10k in debt, and a home worth less than what we owe. What should I do? by hlessi-rahin personalfinance

[–]piratelax40 -1 points0 points ago

no, the only reason we're keeping them on is because you can't just fire someone because their performance isn't outstanding, even if there are better candidates available.

If you want to go from the other angle, how would YOU feel, if your boss came to you and said, hey we're going to be interviewing people for your job, you do a good job and we're happy, but someone contacted us about doing your job for less $$ so we could not interview people if you're willing to take a pay cut right now. If you say no to the pay cut and they didn't find someone, how would you feel about your future prospects at the company knowing they are willing to leverage other possibilities against you in that fashion.

It is one thing to ask for a raise because you believe it is warranted based on performance or the going rate of a person in your position - it is another thing to ask by leveraging another offer.

May get a job halfway around the country for $15k more a year, but we have no cash, $10k in debt, and a home worth less than what we owe. What should I do? by hlessi-rahin personalfinance

[–]piratelax40 0 points1 point ago

of course, but it is the principle of leveraging an offer to put your own employer in a difficult situation.

And I don't know how you can believe this:

Whether you believe it or not, your employer is employing you because you are the best option.

You were the best interview - that doesn't necessarily mean you are the 'best' by a long shot. Shit, we have a couple post-docs in the lab I work at that are terrible - while they didn't lie they stretched the truth a lot. We can't fire them as they technically did nothing wrong, however they are much slower than expected and my PI regrets hiring them big time.

May get a job halfway around the country for $15k more a year, but we have no cash, $10k in debt, and a home worth less than what we owe. What should I do? by hlessi-rahin personalfinance

[–]piratelax40 4 points5 points ago

put yourself in a manager's shoes - not every worker is 'the best'. What if the person is actually just good enough not to be fired, or even just average. As a manager, you might not need to actively fill their role, but if they are asking for more money and you turn them down - do you start looking for a replacement, or even if they are good what happens when 5 other employees then come and say, we started looking for other offers what can you do for us too.

At what point after we "die" do our cells cease to function/die and which type of our cells are the last cells to die off? by TheCake_IsA_Liein askscience

[–]piratelax40 0 points1 point ago

my physiology professor would often say that her 'definition' of cellular death is when they lose concentration gradients necessary for cellular function. Without the gradients you can't jumpstart a cell from some sort of homeostatis - while it might not apoptose or become necrotic immediately, it will no longer be able to function.

May get a job halfway around the country for $15k more a year, but we have no cash, $10k in debt, and a home worth less than what we owe. What should I do? by hlessi-rahin personalfinance

[–]piratelax40 0 points1 point ago

also - how much of a raise is 15k. If you're making 30k and would be getting a 50% increase in income that is a much more substantial long term increase than if you're going from 85-100k etc etc.

May get a job halfway around the country for $15k more a year, but we have no cash, $10k in debt, and a home worth less than what we owe. What should I do? by hlessi-rahin personalfinance

[–]piratelax40 7 points8 points ago

this is from my dad - a successful businessman - by bringing an offer letter to your boss you essentially are saying I'm only working here because this is the best option...for now. They have no assurances you won't do that again in 5 years etc etc to continually play competitors against your own company for pay raises. It puts your boss in a tight situation because even if you are worth more to them, if word gets out etc, other employees could also start to leverage other offers etc etc. Likewise, if you aren't, then by shutting you down it can damage the work relationship. For example, what if you were in contention for a promotion, and it was between you and another - if they weren't able to give you it now, they might worry about considering you for it down the line as you've shown that you are willing to leverage other offers.

As for my advice, I would instead suggest going to your boss and (if you believe this is true) say look I've been working hard and doing a good job blah blah blah, I believe I have earned a pay increase of $$. Likewise, do some investigating as to the other pay of equal jobs in the area - if they are higher, you can try to negotiate a better wage under the pretense of matching the market.

Girlfriend and I did a Tough Mudder in PA, thought it was a bit easy, what should we do next by seniorsassycatin AdventureRacing

[–]piratelax40 2 points3 points ago

I haven't done a ton of adventure races - but i would assume you're not going to find too much that would be any more difficult. The problem is as you increase difficulty past a certain point your liability goes wayyyyy up. Frankly, most people doing adventure races are just average joes that want a bit more challenge and fun to keep it from being just a half marathon to run.

If you want more obstacles look for the sprint based adventure races as they often will still fit in 15+ obstacles in 3-5 miles. Or train your running up a bit and get in the top 5% and do this

For those who did SS/SL and their variations, or any linear strength progression program, what were your lifts when you started and finished? by Viendin Fitness

[–]piratelax40 0 points1 point ago

Well that definitely makes more sense then - and actually ketogenic diets were developed to help treat epilepsy before they realized they were also good for diabetics. That point aside, for people doing ketogenic (that are non-diabetic) for the weight-loss capacity don't necessarily realize they are inhibiting their gains significantly when compared to paleo due to a complete lack of carbs.

For those who did SS/SL and their variations, or any linear strength progression program, what were your lifts when you started and finished? by Viendin Fitness

[–]piratelax40 0 points1 point ago

switch to paleo if you are into low carb. Seriously, ketogenic diets are for obese people that need to shed lbs. If you're trying to be an 'athlete' you need some carbs or else you're going to stall fast and have less significant gains.

Carbs are the rocket fuel you need to help recovery.

view more: next