Finally had the courage to ask her out.

_Pasha_ · 2012-05-25T22:27:34.720517+00:00

Haha, imgur decided to show me a picture of Keira Knightley. Congrats!

robinw · 2012-05-25T22:25:10.167640+00:00

I have a real résumé, and I use two accented e's.

Experiment627 · 2 days

Well, it's a really fucking good thing that you're not a cop, isn't it?

dragonworthy · 3 days

"Crystalline water with manta ray shine"

hokiebird · 3 days

Well done! Thanks for all of the hard work.

TestZero · 4 days

The best evidence that we have indicates that traditional acupuncture is no more effective than sham acupuncture, i.e. sticking needles in superficially and at random, nor is it more effective than using retracting needles. Claiming that the benefits of acupuncture are due to the placebo effect isn't "presumptuous"; it's in line with the majority of medical studies. While the evidence isn't quite conclusive, it is rather one-sided.

TestZero · 4 days

Bob Ross (happy little trees guy) was a first sergeant in the USAF, though, and so disliked having to be mean that he vowed never to scream again after leaving.

shujin · 5 days

I agree with the premise - mall brands have sales continuously so there's no point to posting them - but who decides which brands are allowed?

empw · 7 days

So that they can stroke their cocks while talking about how much better they are than everyone else, obviously. Isn't that the purpose of this subreddit?

Oops, rustled some jimmies. Sarcasm not obvious enough?

phidel_kashflow · 8 days

The few "cherry-picked" incidents are the only real-world evidence of the dangers of nuclear power.

Are you arguing that we can't say whether nuclear power is safe because there haven't been enough accidents yet?

SThor · 11 days

And I haven't seen any evidence that he isn't smelly or that he shaves his armpits.

pineappleskunk · 11 days

As did everyone else on reddit.

Acebulf · 12 days

Conspiracy theory time: Ostensibly anti-SRS bot and people upvoting it are actually SRS trolls. Proof? No one actually gives a shit about SRS.

linford86 · 13 days

"Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence and deem them like the ark of the covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment. I knew that age well; I belonged to it and labored with it. It deserved well of its country. It was very like the present but without the experience of the present; and forty years of experience in government is worth a century of book-reading; and this they would say themselves were they to rise from the dead. . . . I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions. . . . But I know also, that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Samuel Kercheval, 12 July 1816

EDIT: Also, most of the Framers can, at best, be said to have turned a blind eye to human slavery and I haven't found evidence that any of them supported women's suffrage. Are their opinions on those issues relevant?

Also, if you're downvoting adamdoyle and you see this, please stop. Just because you disagree doesn't mean that you should downvote him.

Oragif · 13 days

Yup. GMail didn't catch it as phishing.

ಠ_ಠ

Looking at you, Google.

linford86 · 13 days

As the federal government did not have an Office of Education until 1867 and the idea of incorporation practically didn't exist before the 1920's, I'd say that whatever the Founding Fathers thought on the issue is completely irrelevant to the modern Constitution.

linford86 · 13 days

If you're at all concerned with the constitutionality of an action, then you must also be concerned with the relevant case law. The "interpretations" you mention are not those of jurists, but the Supreme Court. Seeing as the Supreme Court alone has ultimate authority on issues of constitutionality, I don't see how you can differentiate between the "constitutional argument" and the "constitutional interpretation" of the Supreme Court.

sillyhobbits · 17 days

Beg pardon, but are you the guy that does the bluegrass show on WUVT?

ask0 · 19 days

Are a myth.

louiebaur · 19 days

In the U.S., legal school is a postgraduate program. There's no law major for undergraduates.

jdbee · 20 days

It seems that you're suggesting that it's acceptable to downvote honest questions and not give any answer because it's frustrating that not everyone has read the very extensive collection of links (50+) on the sidebar before posting. That seems rather counterproductive. The OP gets no advice and still won't know why his post was downvoted. Why not leave a comment and try to help him?

I'm not saying that you shouldn't downvote those sorts of posts- if they don't contribute to the community, they absolutely deserve a downvote- but everyone would benefit from the people who make these sort of posts knowing why their posts aren't useful.

dgibb · 21 days

Agreed on both counts. Just for example, check out Saddleback. Similar price and style, but check out the difference in leather quality.

jhudson3 · 21 days

Good luck!

jhudson3 · 21 days

I don't see any reason to split up the subreddit too much. It's not like those posts are drowning out other content. Plus, they're nonexistent for 95% of the year.

nrj

TROPHY CASE

nrj

TROPHY CASE

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login