And last but not least, the only reason you posted this article is because it confirms all your biases. Your submission history has less content then all my 'unintelligent comments' combined.

Somebody has to counter kalhan. You can go through his submission history. There is no need to put unintelligent comments in quotes.

This is just a shitty opinion piece of an article that does absolutely nothing to bring any new light or directions to the Modichods vs the Sudo Sexulars debate.

For some it may be new.

It repeatedly makes Modi sound like the saviour of Indian politics without as much as an interview or even a poll to back up any of it's statements. It's pretty much a Modi circlejerk from start to finish, devoid of any content, just like my comments here.

Polls can be bought up. It is personal opinion of author who happens to be president of Policy research.

The article therefore ends up with zero content and can basically be summarised as 'bros, this congress is like totally effed up yo? This Modi dude is the SHIT! Vote Modi!!'

I see no point in voting for people who I know are the devils.

The article doesn't even BEGIN to even list any criticisms of Modi that are quite well known, let alone address and tackle them. It's pretty much projecting him as the perfect figure.

This is true. But the article was written before Sanjeev bhatt came up with his accusations.

Anyone who is in power, be it UPA, Congress, BJP, RSS, TF2, CS:GO is going to fuck us in the ass.

Should we stop voting then? Should we stop criticizing people who are in power? Should we ignore if somebody is doing great work in development and has risen above petty politics?