Lamps of Disapproval

Korthos · 2 months

Those complaining that it isn't the result of a tweaked terrain generator, because it was made by the OP using WorldEdit, have failed to consider the possibility that the OP is a meth fiend.

beschizza · 3 months

This seed is Dead Calm. 147 is another seed similar to this one.

beschizza · 3 months

Different seed! This gives an island with no tree and near-endless water. Get digging!

beschizza · 3 months

No, the seed is "Dead Calm"

beschizza · 3 months

I hope you like water ... and hate trees.

MrMadMinecraft · 3 months

"norivers" is almost the same as this, with a vast shroom ocean, but you get a survival island (with a chasm!)

HeisenbergUncert · 4 months

How would I be able to post your emails to me, or deleted Boing Boing comments, if I wan't me?

WಠHಠAಠTಠEಠVಠEಠR.

HeisenbergUncert · 4 months

How would I be able to post your emails to me, or deleted Boing Boing comments, if I wan't me?

WಠHಠAಠTಠEಠVಠEಠR.

HeisenbergUncert · 4 months

Actual exact statement:

Wow Xeni, I normally really like your posts but I'm really disappointed. You do know that Dr. Paul received a much higher rating from the ACLU than Obama. I guess we can assume from this post that you will be casting your lot behind the current war monger. Amazing.

So I guess you could say it was your "Exact statement" except for the sanctimonious trolling bits that you got banned for.

HeisenbergUncert · 4 months

Copied from your other thread:

Here's what I wrote.

'Looking at your post history, the mods probably banned you for "I guess we can assume from this post that you will be casting your lot behind the current war monger.'

The problem is not that you called Obama a warmonger.

The full text of your post, so anyone can see the context:

Wow Xeni, I normally really like your posts but I'm really disappointed. You do know that Dr. Paul received a much higher rating from the ACLU than Obama. I guess we can assume from this post that you will be casting your lot behind the current war monger.Amazing.

You were banned for the same kind of attention-baiting fake outrage that you've now taken to Reddit. That you can't find a receptive audience should tell you something: it's better to just have a point and say it straight.

(That you've crossposted this to multiple subreddits says it all, really.)

HeisenbergUncert · 4 months

Here's what I wrote.

'Looking at your post history, the mods probably banned you for "I guess we can assume from this post that you will be casting your lot behind the current war monger.'

The problem is not that you called Obama a warmonger.

The full text of your post, so anyone can see the context:

Wow Xeni, I normally really like your posts but I'm really disappointed. You do know that Dr. Paul received a much higher rating from the ACLU than Obama. I guess we can assume from this post that you will be casting your lot behind the current war monger.Amazing.

You were banned for the same kind of attention-baiting fake outrage that you've now taken to Reddit. That you can't find a receptive audience should tell you something: it's better to just have a point and say it straight.

HeisenbergUncert · 4 months

Rob from Boing Boing here. HeisenbergUncert wasn't banned for calling Obama a warmonger. He was banned for being a whiny complainer, as this post and its illustrious karma illustrates.

HeisenbergUncert · 4 months

Comments are automatically closed after a couple of days.

HeisenbergUncert · 4 months

Rob from Boing Boing here. HeidenbergUncert was banned for ignoring our comment guidelines, which are published in black and white and easy to stick to, with his first ever comment. (The site is currently down for SOPA blackout)

You can call Obama a warmonger all you like, but you can't do the whole "Wow I really like you guys but I'm so disappointed in you for supporting warmongers!" troll act and expect us to publish your comments.

lsimonetta · 5 months

Thank you! (Also, I updated the post to include better sourcing and links for Schmidt and will be sure to post a link to Rosenberg's analysis today)

lsimonetta · 5 months

Bloody hell, man, the fact that I added details and context not present in Muckrock's source article is why it's not simply link-jacking!

Those are both well-attested facts, too. It's not editorializing to point out that Schmidt claimed it was a keylogger; and Carrier IQ certainly threatened the researcher with legal action. Moreover, it was that threat that brought it under greater scrutiny (thanks in part to the EFF's subsequent involvement.)

"your article describes the FBI as having "...refused to give any details..." and yet you don't fully explain their reasoning"

I don't think this is fair at all. My second paragraph quotes the FBI writing that "their release could interfere with pending or prospective law enforcement proceedings." -- and the fourth is a quote of Morisy saying that it's not clear if the FBI is using IQ itself or investigating it.

lsimonetta · 5 months

What in the Boing Boing post editorializes, compared to the original?

Detached09 · 6 months

The fact that the French used a metric system hundreds of years ago means you may not have been the first to discover it?

nothis · 7 months

Hi Reddit! Author here. Yes, tongue-in-cheek.

MrSyphy · 8 months

About 8 hours! Don't worry, you're not crazy.

krazyanimal · 9 months

Establish a pawnbroker conference already, guys!

karmanaut · 9 months

Coreddation Street.

Phrygian · 9 months

You should have a compilation of sinister, looming orchestral music on-hand for those everyday office moments where she can't figure out what to do.

"Huh, so how do you do that thing in Excel?"

mmmmwwwwwooooOOOOOAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRR

beschizza

TROPHY CASE

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login