Hittman

- friends
234 link karma
1,473 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Four-Year Club

    Verified Email

Direct Mailing piece: input and ideas needed ASAP!!! by masstermindin testpac

[–]Hittman 0 points1 point ago

The problem with this one is that people who aren't paying attention, who don't know about the blackouts, won't get it. We need something that everyone, including those who don't use the internet much, will get.

TestPAC has boots on the ground in Lamar Smith's district. Our field campaign has started. Our TV ad is ready to go. Reddit, let's do this thing. by masstermindin politics

[–]Hittman 0 points1 point ago

And don't forget publicity. If you've got a blog, even if it's not usually political, advertise this. Ask friends with blogs to cover the story. Let's get as much publicity as we can.

Here's my article. http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/you-can-help-stop-the-next-sopa/ Where's yours?

TestPAC is planning a moneybomb on Saturday (5k on 5/5) what are some creative ways to reach out to new donors? by masstermindin testpac

[–]Hittman 0 points1 point ago

Any chance of adding paypal to the ways to donate? I went there planning to use some of my paypal stash, but didn't see a way to do that.

Hi there, been an Ex JW for 4 years now, need some support regarding family who doesn't know... by lovelyday216in exjw

[–]Hittman 3 points4 points ago

I'm an fan of reverse disfellowshipping. I did it 30 years ago and life has been great ever since.

I know lots of other people who have tried to maintain relationships with their JW family and the results are always the same. Things go ok for a while, then, through some passive aggressive bullshit, the JWs rip open the Ex-JWs old wounds and make their life miserable for a while. They get over it, things go OK for a while, and then it happens again. And again and again and again.

The sooner you can get all of them out of your life, completely out of your life, the more of your life you'll enjoy without putting up with their hurtful crap.

This Internet provider pledges to put your privacy first. Always. by GraybackPHin technology

[–]Hittman 4 points5 points ago

That was my first thought too.

First, they'll sit back and let him build whatever he wants.

Then they'll set up a wannabee terrorist to use his system. Perhaps have him set off a small bomb or be caught in a crowd with a non-working bomb vest.

They'll say they almost couldn't stop him because he was using this system.

Congress will quickly pass laws making the entire enterprise illegal. There will be lots of screaming here and elsewhere in on the tubes, but the mouth-breathing general public will praise and support Big Brother protecting us from those evil terrorists and nasty pirates.

The only way he'll be able to pull this off is to locate offshore. WAY offshore.

Now that things have died down: Test PAC members, let's talk billboard revisions. by Jeromiewhalenin testpac

[–]Hittman 0 points1 point ago

The advertisers do this for a living. They have been doing this for a living for a very long time. We ignore their experience at our peril.

YOU might find frequently changing billboards catch your eye better. But we're trying to reach the voters - i.e. old people - who can put this idiot out on his ass. We need to do whatever is more likely to reach THEM.

Now that things have died down: Test PAC members, let's talk billboard revisions. by Jeromiewhalenin testpac

[–]Hittman 0 points1 point ago

A simple idea that comes to mind, but would violate the billboards wimpy rules:

Larmar Smith Tried to Break The Internet Vote for Someone Else.

I'd like to do something like that for my congress weasel Kirstin Gilibrand, who ignored 500+ Facebook messages from her constituents who all demanded she drop her support of PIPA. She ignored us.

[Update] to: "Elders want to meet..." post by famheldhostagein exjw

[–]Hittman 2 points3 points ago

"Two or more witnesses" also applies to anyone you tell. (Hearsay evidence, while not admissible in court, is good enough for them.) When my father asked if i was sleeping with my girlfriend I admitted it, and almost immediately got calls from my sister and again from an elder asking the same question.

I just told them it wasn't any of their business and eventually they gave up.

How well do JWs fit Cult criteria? by teksimianin exjw

[–]Hittman 0 points1 point ago

For me, there's only one criteria necessary to spot a cult.

Do they practice shunning? They do? Then they're a cult.

Amish, Scientoligsts, Hesedic Jews, Moonie - all cults.

Researchers have found that smokers are more likely to stop because of anti-social attitudes towards them than from fear of ill-health. by DrJulianBashirin science

[–]Hittman 4 points5 points ago

Actually, no, they don't.

Smokers die earlier, so they don't burden the system as long as people who don't smoke.

Over their lifetime smokers pay tens of thousands of dollars more in taxes than anyone else in the same income bracket.

Between dying earlier and paying more taxes smokers save society money.

http://skepticalob.blogspot.com/2009/04/keep-smoking-die-early-save-money.html

Eating processed red meat boosts risk of dying young, Harvard study finds by slaterhearstin science

[–]Hittman 1 point2 points ago

You get downvotes for citing the most basic rule of epidemiology. Love it.

Eating processed red meat boosts risk of dying young, Harvard study finds by slaterhearstin science

[–]Hittman 0 points1 point ago

Yeah, you're right, lets disregard what the experts say about RR. Let's pretend there's no politics behind this. Let's just pretend...

A personal attack is SO much easier that addressing the facts.

Eating processed red meat boosts risk of dying young, Harvard study finds by slaterhearstin science

[–]Hittman -4 points-3 points ago

The fact is that ANY RR below 2.0 is highly suspect, and those in this range are just nonsense. Epidemiology is not precise enough to measure anything that small. It's like trying to measure microns with a yardstick.

Epidemiology reduces human behavior to numbers, which can't be done with a high degree of precision. It then uses those numbers to extrapolate an estimate of a * probability.* When that number is high (2.0 or better) it's an indication that more research, real white-lab-coat research, is called for. THAT is the purpose of epidemiology - to determine the best place to spend scarce resources.

Epidemiology can not prove anything - and it's not designed to. Citing studies as proof of something isn't just bad science, it's junk science.

Here's my blog post on this mess: http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/meat-is-deadly-yeah-right/

Why Congress is targeting the internet now by namelessnoreasterin politics

[–]Hittman 0 points1 point ago

Its never Lupus.

Can I get some help in "debunking" this? by dnytmin skeptic

[–]Hittman 5 points6 points ago

Consider that it's probably not worth your time to try. You know it's bullshit. Your dad is convinced it God's Truth. You can drop a ten pound book of facts on his toes while whacking him in the ear with a cluebat and he'll still refuse to even consider what you're saying.

Psychic fails on morning TV. Painful to watch by ImNotJesusin skeptic

[–]Hittman 6 points7 points ago

Painful to watch? Hell, I loved it.

We need more news people like that. i.e. real news people, not just good looking but empty talking heads.

Hospital: Smokers need not apply by BusterCrustacianin economy

[–]Hittman 2 points3 points ago

Any nicotine consumption, most likely.

E-cigs give you no tar, there's no SHS, and no smell. You physically use them the way you use a cigarette - by inhaling the vapor and blowing it out. (It's water vapor, though.) But it looks like smoking, and the Nicotine Nannies are trying to get them banned, taxed or otherwise restricted.

This is not about health. This is about hating 20% of the population.

When I leave my house, I am more scared of the police than of criminals. I think a lot of people (minorities especially) have always felt this way. Nothing has changed, except that the American minority is no longer defined by color or race, but by wealth and income. by PenisPumpington69in politics

[–]Hittman 0 points1 point ago

I don't care why the police are getting away with it. I'm only concerned that they are.

The knife I'm talking about was an instance when someone who carved things was walking down the street, bothering no one. A cop got out of his car, followed him, and gunned him down.

Skepchick Rebecca Watson: "Reddit Makes Me Hate Atheists" by MstrBlondein atheism

[–]Hittman -1 points0 points ago

I don't think Rebecca likes much other than the sound of her own voice.

Yes, there are a lot of immature schmucks here - and everywhere else they let anyone in. It's called the internet. Get used to it.

Her fame over the non-incident she whined about a while back (she claimed someone made a very mild pass at her in an elevator at a skeptic convention) has faded - could this be a desperate attempt to get it back?

When I leave my house, I am more scared of the police than of criminals. I think a lot of people (minorities especially) have always felt this way. Nothing has changed, except that the American minority is no longer defined by color or race, but by wealth and income. by PenisPumpington69in politics

[–]Hittman -1 points0 points ago

You mean like murdering people and getting away with it? Shooting someone who had a 3 inch carving knife and walking away? Shooting a kid in the back who was face down, with his hands behind his back, and getting a mere 3 years for manslaughter? Stripping an old man down to nothing, tying him to a chair, and them pepper spraying him to death?.

The reality is the police are not our friends, they are agents of the state looking for arrests, generating revenue, and covering their own asses.

When I leave my house, I am more scared of the police than of criminals. I think a lot of people (minorities especially) have always felt this way. Nothing has changed, except that the American minority is no longer defined by color or race, but by wealth and income. by PenisPumpington69in politics

[–]Hittman 3 points4 points ago

The difference is the criminal knows there may be some repercussions for his actions. The cop knows there will be none, even if he murders you in cold blood.

To the Christians that egged my car this morning. by jayman3439in atheism

[–]Hittman 110 points111 points ago

Doucherotomy

view more: next