510DustMite

- friends
1,033 link karma
2,619 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Three-Year Club

    Verified Email

City of Oakland set to pass broad ordinance to outlaw helmets, backpacks, tripods, shields, water bottles and countless other items at "Demonstrations" (x-post from r/occupywallstreet) by 510DustMitein bayarea

[–]510DustMite[S] -4 points-3 points ago

Exactly. And without these exceptions I have zero faith in the "hired guns" from around the bay area who show up to these protests these days (supposedly due to the reductions in police force in Oakland) doing anything to honor the "spirit of the law" and not simply find ways to bust heads who conflict with the "letter of the law".

These 3 guys belong in jail. If you know them, contact the san diego pd. by mikep500in videos

[–]510DustMite -1 points0 points ago

yes, but you're not thinking about the karma

City of Oakland set to pass broad ordinance to outlaw helmets, backpacks, tripods, shields, water bottles and countless other items at "Demonstrations" (x-post from r/occupywallstreet) by 510DustMitein bayarea

[–]510DustMite[S] -3 points-2 points ago

This is a duplicate post from r/occupywallstreet by oprah666

Their description from the original post:

EMERGENCY CALL TO ACTION- City of Oakland city council is set to vote on an ordinance that would ban for "Tools of violence" at demonstrations. "Tools of violence" would include helmets, shields or any "Impact resistant material with straps" which could mean backpacks, and "Clubs" which could be defined as tripods, or water bottles. This ordinance would give officers probable cause to search and arrest anyone found carrying these items at a "Demonstration." What a demonstration is, is not defined at all in the ordinance, so a demonstration could consist of any event any officer subjectively decides is a demonstration. Please come to the special public safety committee meeting tomorrow (5/22/12) at 6 pm, Oakland city hall to air your grievances. They want to ban anything made of wood, plastic, or metal, of any length, if it is bigger than ¼” x 2” in diameter, or if cylindrical bigger than ¾." That’s how the ordinance defines a “club.” This would ban just about anything – cameras, ice chests, water bottles, etc. Even if it is amended to specify a minimum length, so it actually identifies potential clubs, the dimensions are so small that it would ban tripods and monopods, boom stands for microphones, and a lot of sign posts. Worse, it would give the police probable cause to arrest anyone carrying anything which might be bigger than those dimensions. There is plenty of legal justification against this law. First of all, it isn't enforceable. A law that is not enforceable creates a situation of selective enforcement by default. There is no possible way to arrest every person carrying a "Club" as defined by this law, they will only arrest those that they feel like arresting, creating a situation of political repression. Second about shields, and other personal protective gear. It is completely reasonable to assume that you will be injured at a protest if you are in the vicinity of the OPD, regardless of if you are within the law. This is well documented trend. The OPD regularly violate their own crowd control policies, and seriously injure protestors. Therefore, it is reasonable for any person to take measures to protect their person from needless injury. Click on the link that says "View report" to read the text of the ordinance. http://oakland.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=1124977&GUID=0FD60290-DA2B-4CAC-A5B1-C5924860B579&Options&Search

Warriors to build new arena, move back to San Francisco by iwantedtoexplodein bayarea

[–]510DustMite 3 points4 points ago

And Oakland continues to slowly deflate...

Zimmerman medical report shows he had a broken nose, two black eyes and multiple lacerations on his head after suffering attack by Trayvon Martin by ethicalkingin news

[–]510DustMite 0 points1 point ago

"the family physician of... George Zimmerman" suggests it is a doctor which Zimmerman at some regular interval attends, not a family physician or general practitioner that he went to on this one occasion. If that's not the case, you're right that the wording is misleading. I hope this is clarified.

New to Reddit!! Here is my first oil painting :) What do you think? Corrupted self portrait by Peachachuin Art

[–]510DustMite -1 points0 points ago

There's a lot that's nice about it, but I'd spend a little more time planning out the form. Unfortunately, there's no way for the neck to bend the way you have it, which throws off my experience of the painting. Is this a composite of two images? If that's the case, have you considered working from life rather than from flat images?

This was our view from class this morning by aveenin WTF

[–]510DustMite 0 points1 point ago

That's true, but not if the body was in motion.

attach a child to a chain (or strong rope), swing that chain around in an open space, and you will see what i mean.

DAE have a creepy father? One that is slightly inappropriate? (NSFW) by spambatin DoesAnybodyElse

[–]510DustMite 2 points3 points ago

sounds like he may have started the champagne consumption before the play started...

Two facts creationists often ignore by GnawXirin atheism

[–]510DustMite -1 points0 points ago*

Also: We do not have evidence to link dinosaur and bird DNA since we have not yet recovered intact dinosaur DNA.

Obviously, there is substantial evidence to link these two wonderful creatures, just not the DNA evidence this ham-fisted photo suggests.

EDIT: I should clarify. I'm referring to dinosaurs of the period suggested in the image, and referred to in the common use of the term "dinosaur".

Ink and highlighter by CrystalJeffin Art

[–]510DustMite 14 points15 points ago

Please invest in some light-fast markers. These will fade and discolor very quickly in any light. (the sharpies as well, but not nearly to the degree the highlighter will.)

The most badass ground support aircraft to ever be built by speedemon92in pics

[–]510DustMite 0 points1 point ago

In case you were wondering, the sound is terrifying as well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WQCcoKBEzs&feature=related

Statues by man_in_the_mirrain funny

[–]510DustMite 0 points1 point ago

May be late to the party, but I thought I'd throw my hat in:

http://i.imgur.com/kBRoe.jpg

the Jackson kid. by pandatitsin funny

[–]510DustMite 0 points1 point ago

The state of r/funny, really... Or any auto-assigned subreddit to be honest.

The Cat Pearl by 510DustMitein WTF

[–]510DustMite[S] 1 point2 points ago

Couldn't be certain, but I believe it's a sebaceous cyst that his body eventually worked out... Or, a pearl with a tiny cat skeleton inside...

The Cat Pearl by 510DustMitein WTF

[–]510DustMite[S] 88 points89 points ago

It's actually quite hard. But I'm sure there's a smaller cat inside. And I'm not ready for that...

The Cat Pearl by 510DustMitein WTF

[–]510DustMite[S] 24 points25 points ago

For over a year, this has been growing out of my cat's back. It started as a small bump and became what I thought was a mole. The mole began to grow larger and harden, and I thought he may have been a gonner... I started calling vets today as a last effort. That must have been the signal, as when I was telling my roommate about it, he went down to give him a scratch and tinktinktink it comes rolling off his back and on to the floor. My little miracle, he is...

view more: next